LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF ECO-FRIENDLY CONCRETE WITH RESIDUAL DEMOLITION AGREGATE AND POZZOLAN
ANÁLISE DO CUSTO DO CICLO DE VIDA DE CONCRETOS ECOAMIGÁVEIS COM AGREGADO RESIDUAL DE DEMOLIÇÃO E POZOLANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2023.v9.n1.62-70Abstract
The civil construction stands out as a sector with a high environment impact. In this industry, concrete is the main protagonist due to the large volume and the demand of a non-renewable natural resources for its production. Therefore, this work aims to study the environment impact and the costs of different alternatives of eco-friendly concrete, composed by two types of cement (CP IV and CP V-ARI), rice husk ash pozzolan (RHA) and different rates of construction and demolition waste (CDW) . Tests of axial compression stress and accelerated carbonation were performed in order to enable the modular life cycle evaluation and the costs estimation. The results allowed an integrated comparative analysis of different concrete mixtures in terms of environmental, economic and structural performance. The presence of CDW in mixtures with CP IV was not beneficial, as it considerably reduced the service life of the samples. When performing the unitary assessment of costs and environmental impacts, the mixture with the highest concentration of RCD (30%) and CP IV cement showed the worst performance. The replacement of cement by RHA was positive only in mixtures with low CDW content (15%) .
References
UNEP; SETAC. United Nations Environmental Programme-Society Of Environmental Toxicology And Chemistry. Life cycle management: a business guide to sustainability. Paris, 51 p, 2007.
MEHTA, P.K. Reducing the Environmental Impact of Concrete, ACI Concrete International, 23 (10), pp. 61-66, 2001.
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC, 2014. Disponível em:<http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf>.
Acesso em 03 de junho de 2021.
VON BAHR, B et al. Experiences of environmental performance evaluation in the cement industry. Data quality of environmental performance indicators as a limiting factor for Benchmarking and Rating. Journal of Cleaner Production. Pp 723-725, 2002.
PILLAI, R.G et al. Service life and life cycle assessment of reinforced concrete systems with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 2018.
BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA nº. 307, de 5 de julho de 2002. Estabelece diretrizes, critérios e procedimentos para a gestão de resíduos da construção civil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente: CONAMA. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF: Imprensa Oficial, 2002.
SCHAMNE, Annelise N.; NAGALLI, André. Reverse logistics in the construction sector: a literature review, The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, v.21, pp. 691-702, 2016.
SINGH. B. Rice Husk – An Overview. Waste and Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India, 2018.
MARTIRENA. F; MANZÓ. J. Vegetable ashes as Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol 114, pp 57-64, 2018.
CONSELHO BRASILEIRO DE CONSTRUÇÃO SUSTENTÁVEL. Projeto ACV-m: Sustentabilidade na indústria de blocos e pavimentos de concreto: Avaliação de Ciclo de Vida Modular. p 94, 2014.
ITAMBÉ. Cimento. Curitiba, Itambé, 20 p, 2010.
SANTOS, Cristiane Carine. Concreto com Misturas de Agregado Residual de Construção e Demolição (RCD) e Pozolana, com Ênfase na Cabonatação. Dissertação de Mestrado – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2017.
NBR 5739. Concreto: Ensaios de compressão de corpos-de-prova cilíndricos. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2007.
RILEM. Recomendations of TC 116-PCD. Tests for gas permeability of concrete. Materials and Structures. V. 32, 1999.
TCPO. Tabela de Composição de Preços para Orçamento. 13 edição. São Paulo, Pini, 2008.
INSTITUTO AÇO BRASIL. Relatório de Sustentabilidade. Instituto Aço Brasil, 49 p, 2013.
LAMBERTI, L. A. Análise do ciclo de vida e de custo de pilar com diferentes traços de concreto frente a carbonatação: do berço ao túmulo. Dissertação de Mestrado –Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2015.
LAGERBLAD, B. Carbon Dioxide Uptake During Concrete Life Cycle – State of the art. Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute. CBI, 2006.
PADE, C ; GUIMARÃES, M. The CO2 uptake concrete in a 100 years perspective. Cement and Concrete Research. V 37, n 9, p 1348- 1356, 2007.
COLLINS, F. Inclusion of carbonation during life cycle of built and recycled concrete; influence on their carbon footprint. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. V 15, n6, 2010.
NBR ISO 14040. Gestão ambiental: Avaliação do ciclo de vida: Princípios e estrutura. Rio de Janeiro,2014.
BRASIL. Sistema nacional de pesquisa de custos e índices da construção civil, 2015. Disponível em:< www.caixa.gov.br/sinapi>. Acesso em: 03 junho de 2021.
NBR 15575-1: Edificações habitacionais: desempenho: parte 1: requisitos gerais. Rio de Janeiro; ABNT, 2013.
PRÉ CONSULTANTS. SimaPro 7 Database Manual: Methods: Library. 67 p, 2016.
IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC, 2007. Disponível em:< http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg3_report_mitigation_of_climate_change.htm >. Acesso em: 03 de Junho de 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Guilherme Danezi Piccini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Copyright Notice
Attribution 4.0 International
