MODELOS MENTALES Y RUTINAS ORGANIZATIVAS: UN DEBATE SOBRE LA CAPACIDAD DE ABSORCIÓN Y LA SOSTENIBILIDAD
MENTAL MODELS AND ORGANIZATIONAL ROUTINS: A DISCUSSION ON ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2023.v9.n4.125-141Palabras clave:
Capacidad de absorción, Sostenibilidad, Rendimiento sostenibleResumen
Este documento forma parte de una tesis doctoral defendida en 2022, formando parte de la discusión teórica sobre la Capacidad de Absorción y el Desempeño Sostenible de las organizaciones y sus relaciones.
Objetivo - A partir del modelo de Capacidad de Lane et al (2006), discutir cuestiones planteadas por autores como: "¿qué rutinas organizacionales permiten la adquisición de conocimiento verde externo?" o "¿qué modelos mentales permiten la adquisición de conocimiento verde en las organizaciones?".
Metodología - Análisis de contenido, a partir de artículos indexados en SCOPUS y WEB of SCIENCE utilizando el software AtlasTi como herramienta de apoyo y análisis.
Resultados - El análisis en profundidad de los textos y la discusión teórica condujeron a la creación de dos hipótesis sobre la relación entre los modelos mentales sostenibles (SMM) y las rutinas organizativas (OR) como impulsores de la capacidad de absorción verde y el desempeño sostenible de las organizaciones, que serán puestas a prueba.
Citas
ABBAS, Z. et al. Green HRM promotes higher education sustainability: a mediated-moderated analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 19 jul. 2021.
ACQUAYE, A. et al. A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 269, n. 1, p. 188–205, 16 ago. 2018.
ADAMIDES, E.; KARACAPILIDIS, N. Information technology for supporting the development and maintenance of open innovation capabilities. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, v. 5, n. 1, p. 29–38, 2020.
AL-ABRROW, H.; ALI, J.; ALNOOR, A. Multilevel Influence of Routine Redesigning, Legitimacy and Functional Affordance on Sustainability Accounting: Mediating Role of Organizational Sense-making. Global Business Review, v. 23, n. 2, p. 287–312, 1 abr. 2022.
APEJI, U. D.; SUNMOLA, F. T. Principles and Factors Influencing Visibility in Sustainable Supply Chains. Procedia Computer Science. Anais...Elsevier B.V., 2022.
BAESHEN, Y.; SOOMRO, Y. A.; BHUTTO, M. Y. Determinants of Green Innovation to Achieve Sustainable Business Performance: Evidence From SMEs. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, 18 nov. 2021.
CHALMERS, D. M.; BALAN-VNUK, E. Innovating not-for-profit social ventures: Exploring the microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. International Small Business Journal, v. 31, n. 7, p. 785–810, 2012.
CHEN, H. H.; LEE, A. H. I.; CHEN, J. The relationship between innovation and performance in special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms. Journal of Management and Organization, v. 23, n. 4, p. 587–602, 2017.
CHEN, Y. S. et al. Enhancing green absorptive capacity, green dynamic capacities and green service innovation to improve firm performance: An analysis of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 7, n. 11, p. 15674–15692, 2015.
CHEN, Y. S.; CHANG, C. H.; LIN, Y. H. The determinants of green radical and incremental innovation performance: Green shared vision, green absorptive capacity, and green organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 6, n. 11, p. 7787–7806, 2014.
COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on and Innovation Learning. Administrative Science Quarterley, v. 35, n. 1, p. 128–152, 1990.
COLLIS, D. J. RESEARCH NOTE: HOW VALUABLE ARE ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITIES? Strategic Management Journal, v. 15, p. 143–152, 1994.
COOPER, V.; MOLLA, A. Information systems absorptive capacity for environmentally driven IS-enabled transformation. Information Systems Journal, v. 27, n. 4, p. 379–425, 2016.
CUI, R. et al. Interorganizational learning, green knowledge integration capability and green innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 24, n. 4, p. 1292–1314, 2020.
DUBEY, R. et al. Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: Some empirical findings. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 193, p. 63–76, 2017.
FAROOQ, K. et al. Make it their Decisions, not your Directives: Exploring Required Green Competencies for Employee Ecological Behaviour. Organizacija, v. 55, n. 2, p. 128–141, 1 maio 2022.
FELIN, T. et al. Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Journal of Management Studies, v. 49, n. 8, p. 1351–1374, 2012.
GALBREATH, J. Drivers of Green Innovations: The Impact of Export Intensity, Women Leaders, and Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1–15, 2017.
GANGI, F.; MUSTILLI, M.; VARRONE, N. The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) knowledge on corporate financial performance: evidence from the European banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 23, n. 1, p. 110–134, 2019.
GARAY, L.; FONT, X.; PEREIRA-MOLINER, J. Understanding sustainability behaviour: The relationship between information acquisition, proactivity and performance. Tourism Management, v. 60, p. 418–429, 2017.
GARRITY, E. J. Using systems thinking to understand and enlarge mental models: Helping the transition to a sustainable world. Systems, v. 6, n. 2, 1 jun. 2018.
GHASSIM, B.; FOSS, L. Understanding the micro-foundations of internal capabilities for open innovation in the minerals industry: a holistic sustainability perspective. Resources Policy, p. 1–13, 2018.
GIL-MARQUES, M.; MORENO-LUZON, M. D. Building sustainable contextual ambidexterity through routines: A case study from information technology firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 12, n. 24, p. 1–19, 2 dez. 2020.
HELFAT, C. E.; PETERAF, M. A. Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 2009.
HELLSMARK, H. et al. Innovation system strengths and weaknesses in progressing sustainable technology: The case of Swedish biorefinery development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 131, p. 702–715, 2016.
HIELSCHER, S.; WILL, M. G. Mental models of sustainability: Unearthing and analyzing the mental images of corporate sustainability with qualitative empirical research. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, v. 31, n. 6, p. 708–719, 1 nov. 2014.
HOFFMAN, M.; LUBELL, M.; HILLIS, V. Linking knowledge and action through mental models of sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 111, n. 36, p. 13016–13021, 2014.
HUKKINEN, J. INSTITUTIONS IN ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT Constructing mental models and and sustainability. 1. ed. London: Routledge, 1999. v. 1
JAKOBSEN, S.; LAUVÅS, T. A.; STEINMO, M. Collaborative dynamics in environmental R&D alliances. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 212, p. 950–959, 2019.
JANSEN, J. J. P.; VAN DEN BOSCH, F. A. J.; VOLBERDA, H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, v. 48, n. 6, p. 999–1015, 2005.
KISS, A. N.; BARR, P. S. New Product Development Strategy Implementation Duration and New Venture Performance: A Contingency-Based Perspective. Journal of Management, v. 43, n. 4, p. 1185–1210, 2017.
KRIPPENDORFF, K. Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. [s.l.] Wiley Online Library, 2004. v. 30
LANE, P. J.; KOKA, B. R.; PATHAK, S. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, v. 31, n. 4, p. 833–863, 2006.
LANE, P. J.; LUBATKIN, M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, v. 19, n. 5, p. 461–477, 1998.
LEVY, M. A.; LUBELL, M. N.; MCROBERTS, N. The structure of mental models of sustainable agriculture. Nature Sustainability, v. 1, n. 8, p. 413–420, 1 ago. 2018.
LEWIN, A. Y.; MASSINI, S.; PEETERS, C. Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, v. 22, n. 1, p. 81–98, jan. 2011.
LIN, H. F.; SU, J. Q.; HIGGINS, A. How dynamic capabilities affect adoption of management innovations. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 2, p. 862–876, 2016.
LIN, Y. H.; CHEN, Y. S. Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality and Quantity, v. 51, n. 4, p. 1663–1685, 1 jul. 2017.
LIU, L.; ZHANG, M.; YE, W. The adoption of sustainable practices: A supplier’s perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 232, n. October 2018, p. 692–701, 2019.
LONG, C.; LIN, J. Theoretical and exploratory research on sustainability mental model of the public in China: based on a typical survey in Guangdong province. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, v. 15, n. 2, p. 167–174, 3 abr. 2017.
MARRUCCI, L. et al. Antecedents of absorptive capacity in the development of circular economy business models of small and medium enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 31, n. 1, p. 532–544, 1 jan. 2022.
MEIRUN, T.; MAKHLOUFI, L.; HASSAN, M. G. Environmental outcomes of green entrepreneurship harmonization. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 12, n. 24, p. 1–27, 2 dez. 2020.
MOUSAVI, S.; BOSSINK, B.; VAN VLIET, M. Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 203, p. 224–239, 1 dez. 2018.
OJO, A. O.; RAMAN, M. Micro perceptive on absorptive capacity in joint ICT project teams in Malaysia. Library Review, v. 64, p. 162–178, 2015.
PACE, L. A. How do tourism firms innovate for sustainable energy consumption? A capabilities perspective on the adoption of energy efficiency in tourism accommodation establishments. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 111, p. 409–420, 16 jan. 2016.
PHAM, D. D. T.; PAILLÉ, P.; HALILEM, N. Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view. Journal of Cleaner ProductionElsevier Ltd, , 20 fev. 2019.
QU, X. et al. Green core competencies to prompt green absorptive capacity and bolster green innovation: the moderating role of organization’s green culture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v. 65, n. 3, p. 536–561, 2022.
R. ABIDIN et al. Environamental Sustainability Performance: The Influence os Supplier and Customer Itengration. The Social Science, v. 11, p. 2673–2678, 2016.
RAINERI, N.; PAILLÉ, P. Linking Corporate Policy and Supervisory Support with Environmental Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Employee Environmental Beliefs and Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 137, n. 1, p. 129–148, 1 ago. 2016.
ROSNER, W. J. Mental models for sustainability. J. Cleaner Prod, v. 3, n. 2, p. 107–121, 1995.
SADELI, S. et al. A REVIEW ON THE EFFECTS OF GREEN STRATEGY ON FIRMS’ ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE. JURNAL TEKNIKAL & KAJIAN SOSIAL , v. 20, n. 2, 2022.
SETYADI, A. Does green supply chain integration contribute towards sustainable performance? Uncertain Supply Chain Management, v. 7, n. 2, p. 121–132, 2019.
TANNER, A. S. et al. The water Utility Adoption Model (wUAM): Understanding influences of organisational and procedural innovation in a UK water utility. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 171, p. S86–S96, 2016.
TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Knowledge and Strategy, v. 18, n. April 1991, p. 77–116, 2009.
TROWBRIDGE, J. et al. Examining Intersectoral Action as an Approach to Implementing Multistakeholder Collaborations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Public Health, v. 67, 16 maio 2022.
WANG, C.; BRUNSWICKER, S.; MAJCHRZAK, A. Knowledge search breadth and depth and OI projects performance: a moderated mediation model of control mechanism. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, v. 25, n. 4, p. 847–870, 2021.
WHITE, M. D.; MARSH, E. E. Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, v. 55, n. 1, p. 22–45, 2006.
YAHYA, S.; JAMIL, S.; FAROOQ, M. The impact of green organizational and human resource factors on developing countries’ small business firms tendency toward green innovation: A natural resource-based view approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 30, n. 4, p. 726–741, 1 dez. 2021.
ZHANG, J. et al. Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 29, n. 1, p. 39–53, 1 jan. 2020.
ZHOU, M. et al. How to drive green innovation in China’s mining enterprises? Under the perspective of environmental legitimacy and green absorptive capacity. Resources Policy, v. 72, 1 ago. 2021.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Ricardo Barcelos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Aviso de Direito Autoral Creative Commons
1. Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto após o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
