ACV DE MATERIAIS CIMENTÍCIOS SUPLEMENTARES E AGREGADOS RECICLADOS: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA
LCA OF SUPPLEMENTARY CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS AND RECYCLED AGREGGATES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2023.v9.n3.67-81Palavras-chave:
Impactos ambientais, Ciclo de vida, ArgamassaResumo
O presente estudo tem como objetivo realizar uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura (RSL) sobre a avaliação dos impactos ambientais por decorrentes do uso de Materiais Cimentícios Suplementares (MCS) e Agregado Reciclado (AR) em materiais de construção, por meio da metodologia de Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida (ACV). A metodologia consistiu na busca de documentos científicos sobre ACV para a avaliação de concretos e argamassas que empregam MCS e AR, nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science, período de 2015 e 2021. Os resultados mostram que estudos adotam uma fronteira do sistema berço ao portão, atribuindo-se que é o mais representativo. Para realizar a ACV, dados secundários são utilizados, principalmente bancos de dados (Ecoinvent e ELCD). O Potencial de Aquecimento Global é a categoria de impacto comum, seguido por Potencial de Depleção Abiótica e Potencial de Acidificação. Os métodos utilizados quantificam apenas os efeitos intermediários das categorias de impacto; esta etapa é assistida pelos programas Simapro e OpenLCA, preferencialmente. Os estudos mostraram que o uso de MCS e AR conseguem reduzir os impactos ambientais dos concretos e argamassas avaliadas, mas a redução é maior quando ambos são usados ao mesmo tempo do que quando usados separadamente.
Referências
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Limpeza Pública e Resíduos Especiais – ABRELPE. Panorama dos resíduos sólidos no Brasil 2020. ABRELPE, São Paulo, 2020.
ANASTASIOU, E. K.; LIAPIS, A.; PAPAYIANNI, I. Comparative life cycle assessment of concrete road pavements using industrial by-products as alternative materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 101, p. 1–8, 2015.
ARRIGONI, A. et al. Rammed Earth incorporating Recycled Concrete Aggregate: a sustainable, resistant and breathable construction solution. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 137, n. May, p. 11–20, 2018.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS – ABNT. NBR ISO 14040: Gestão Ambiental - Avaliação do Ciclo de Vida - Princípios e Estrutura. Rio de Janeiro, 2009.
BORGHI, G.; PANTINI, S.; RIGAMONTI, L. Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) management in Lombardy Region (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 184, p. 815–825, 2018.
BÖSCH, M.; HELLWEG, S. Identifying improvement potentials in cement production with life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 44, n. 23, p. 9143-9149, 2010. Doi: 10.1021/es100771k
BRAGA, A. M.; SILVESTRE, J. D.; DE BRITO, J. Compared environmental and economic impact from cradle to gate of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 162, p. 529–543, 2017.
CALDAS, L. R. et al. Environmental impact assessment of wood bio-concretes: Evaluation of the influence of different supplementary cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, v. 268, 2021.
CHEN, C. et al. LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: an application to mineral additions in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 54, n. 12, p. 1231–1240, 2010. Doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001
COLANGELO, F.; FORCINA, A.; FARINA, I.; PETRILLO, A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different kinds of concrete containing waste for sustainable construction. Buildings, v. 8, n. 5, 2018. Doi: 10.3390/buildings8050070
COLLINS, F. Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: influence on their carbon footprint. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, v. 15, p. 549-556, 2010. Doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0191-4
DABOUS, S. A.; FEROZ, S. Condition monitoring of bridges with non-contact testing technologies. Automation in Construction, v. 116, 103224, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103224
De LARRIVA, R. et al. decisionmaking LCA for energy refurbishment of buildings: conditions of comfort. Energy Buildings, v. 70, p. 333–342, 2014. Doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.049
De SOUZA, A. et al. Application of the desirability function for the development of new composite eco-efficiency indicators for concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 40, 102374, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102374
DOSSCHE, C.; BOEL, V.; CORTE, W.D. Comparative material-based life cycle analysis of structural beam-floor systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 194, p. 327-341, 2018. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.062
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION. EN 15804, Sustainability of Construction Works - Environmental Product Declarations - Core Rules for the Product Category of Construction Products, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
EUROPEAN UNION DIRECTIVE. EU Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the European Union, L312:3–30, 2008.
FOŘT, J.; ČERNÝ, R. Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios. Waste Management, v. 118, p. 510–520, 2020.
GALAN, I.; ANDRADE, C.; MORA, P.; SANJUAN, M. A. Sequestration of CO2 by Concrete Carbonation. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 44, n. 8; p. 3181-3186, 2010. Doi: 10.1021/es903581d
GUO, Z. et al. Life-cycle assessment of concrete building blocks incorporating recycled concrete aggregates—A case study in China. In Advances in Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling. Woodhead Publishing, 2020, p. 515-535. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819055-5.00025-5
HISCHIER, R.; REICHART, I. Multifunctional electronic media-traditional media. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, v. 8, n. 4, p. 201-208, 2003. Doi: 10.1007/BF02978472
HOSSAIN, U.; XUAN, D.; POON, C. S. Sustainable management and utilization of concrete slurry waste: A case study in Hong Kong. Waste Management, v. 61, p. 397–404, 2017.
HOSSAIN, M.; POON, C.; DONG, Y.; XUAN, D. Evaluation of environmental impact distribution methods for supplementary cementitious materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 82, p. 597–608, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.048
HOSSAIN, M. et al. Evaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong. Environment International, v. 145, 106139, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106139
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 14040, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006a.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 14044, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006b.
ISLAM, H.; JOLLANDS, M.; SETUNGE, S. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings—a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 42, p. 129–140, 2015. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.006
KIM, S.; DALE, B. Ethanol fuels: E10 or E85 – Life cycle perspectives. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, v. 11, n. 2, p. 117-121, 2006. Doi: 10.1065/lca2005.02.201
KIM, T.; CHAE, C. Environmental impact analysis of acidification and eutrophication due to emissions from the production of concrete. Sustainability, v. 8, n. 6, 578:1–20, 2016. Doi: 10.3390/su8060578
KUA, H.; KAMATH, S. An attributional and consequential life cycle assessment of substituting concrete with bricks. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 81, p. 190–200, 2014. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.006
KURDA, R. et al. Effect of incorporation of high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash on the strength and global warming potential of concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 166, p. 485–502, 2017.
KURDA, R.; SILVESTRE, J. D.; DE BRITO, J. Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 139, 407-417, 2018. Doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.004
KURDA, R.; DE BRITO, J.; SILVESTRE, J. A comparative study of the mechanical and life cycle assessment of high-content fly ash and recycled aggregates concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 29, 101173, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101173
LEE, J.; LEE, T.; JEONG, J.; JEONG, J. Sustainability and performance assessment of binary blended low-carbon concrete using supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 280, 124373, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124373
LI, J.; ZHANG, W.; LI, C.; MONTEIRO, P. J. Green concrete containing diatomaceous earth and limestone: Workability, mechanical properties, and life-cycle assessment. Journal of cleaner production, v. 223, p. 662-679, 2019. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.077
LIMA, P. R. L.; ROQUE, A. B.; FONTES, C. M. A.; LIMA, J. M. F.; BARROS, J. A. Potentialities of cement-based recycled materials reinforced with sisal fibers as a filler component of precast concrete slabs. In Sustainable and Nonconventional Construction Materials Using Inorganic Bonded Fiber Composites, Woodhead Publishing, 399-428, 2017. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102001-2.00017-6
LO, F.; LEE, M.; LO, S. Effect of coal ash and rice husk ash partial replacement in ordinary Portland cement on pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, v. 286, 122947, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122947
MARINKOVIC et al. Environmental assessment of green concretes for structural use. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 154, p. 633–649, 2017.
MEEK, A.; ELCHALAKANI, M.; BECKETT, C.; GRANT, T. Alternative stabilised rammed earth materials incorporating recycled waste and industrial by-products: Life cycle assessment. Construction and Building Materials, v. 267, 120997, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120997
MORENO-JUEZ, J.; VEGAS, I.; GEBREMARIAM, A.; GARCÍA-CORTÉS, V.; DI MAIO, F. Treatment of end-of-life concrete in an innovative heating-air classification system for circular cement-based products. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 263, 121515, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121515
MORO, C.; FRANCIOSO, V.; SCHRAGER, M.; VELAY-LIZANCOS, M. TiO2 nanoparticles influence on the environmental performance of natural and recycled mortars: A life cycle assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 84, 106430, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106430
RASHID, A.; YUSOFF, S. A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 45, p. 244–248, 2015. Doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.043
ROBAYO-SALAZAR, R. A.; MEJÍA-ARCILA, J. M.; MEJÍA DE GUTIÉRREZ, R. Eco-efficient alkali-activated cement based on red clay brick wastes suitable for the manufacturing of building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 166, p. 242–252, 2017.
ROH, S.; KIM, R.; PARK, W.; BAN, H. Environmental Evaluation of Concrete Containing Recycled and By-Product Aggregates Based on Life Cycle Assessment. Applied Sciences, v. 10, n. 217503, 2020. Doi: 10.3390/app10217503
ROSADO, L. P.; VITALE, P.; PENTEADO, C. S. G.; ARENA, U. Life cycle assessment of natural and mixed recycled aggregate production in Brazil. Journal of cleaner production, v. 151, 634-642, 2017. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.068
SABAU, M.; BOMPA, D. V.; SILVA, L. F. O. Comparative carbon emission assessments of recycled and natural aggregate concrete: Environmental influence of cement content. Geoscience Frontiers, v. 12, n. 6, p. 101235, 2021.
SUÁREZ, S.; ROCA, X.; GASSO, S. Product-specific life cycle assessment of recycled gypsum as a replacement for natural gypsum in ordinary Portland cement: Application to the Spanish context. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 117, p. 150–159, 2016.
TEIXEIRA, E. R. et al. Comparative environmental life-cycle analysis of concretes using biomass and coal fly ashes as partial cement replacement material. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 112, p. 2221–2230, 2016.
TURK, J,; COTIC, Z,.; MLADENOVIC, A.; SAJNA, A. Environmental evaluation of green concretes versus conventional concrete by means of LCA. Waste Management, v. 45, p. 194–205, 2015. Doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.035
VAN DEN HEEDE, P.; DE BELIE, N. Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: literature review and theoretical calculations. Cement and Concrete Composites, v. 34, n. 4, p. 431–42, 2012. Doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.004
VIEIRA, D.R.; CALMON, J.L.; COELHO, F.Z. Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: a review. Construction and Building Materials, v. 124, 656–666, 2016. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.125
VISINTIN, P.; XIE, T.; BENNETT, B. A large-scale life-cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete: The influence of functional unit, emissions allocation and carbon dioxide uptake. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 248, 119243, 2020. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119243
ZHANG, Y. et al. A review of life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, v. 209, p. 115-125, 2019a. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.078
ZHANG, Y. et al. Effect of compressive strength and chloride diffusion on life cycle CO2 assessment
of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 218, p. 450-458, 2019b. Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.335
ZHOU, A. et al. A novel approach for recycling engineering sediment waste as sustainable supplementary cementitious materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 167, 105435, 2021. Doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Autores
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aviso de Direito Autoral Creative Commons
1. Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto após o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
