Evaluation of risks using the FMEA reverse tool (RFMEA): Case study at an auto parts company
Keywords:FMEA, RFMEA, Quality Improvement, Risk Reduction, Disaster Reduction
AbstractThis article describes the application of a new tool that uses the extension of Failure Mode and Analysis of Effects (FMEA) for project risk analysis and which is being labeled as FMEA Reverse (RFMEA). The purpose of this file is to describe the application and monitor the use of this tool, which is a modification of the already consolidated process, product and service FMEA technique. With the purpose of knowing what already exists in the literature on the subject here approached, an exploratory bibliographical research was carried out, in order to identify tools and methods used. To illustrate the study was followed by its application in an auto parts industry in its manufacturing process, seeking to prevent and reduce the risks of failures, improving processes and devices, and in the end, compare the current situation with future results. The results obtained were the improvement in the process, reduction of risks and direct and indirect costs of approximately 70%. The benefits of RFMEA include a greater focus on risk prevention and contingency, improving integration and participation of the project team, enabling better risk management and the development of process improvement actions and mitigation of risks.
ASSAF, S.; AL-HEJJI, X. (2006). Causes of delay in large construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (4), 349-357.
AUTOLIV (2017) Our Products. Disponível em: <https://www.autoliv.com/products/airbags>. Acesso em 07/11/20176
BESSANT, J.; FRANCIS. D. (1999). Developing strategic continuous improvement capability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Vol. 19, No. 11, p. 1106-1119.
BRITO, O S. (2007). Gestão de riscos: uma abordagem orientada a riscos operacionais. São Paulo: Savaiva,
CABONE, T. A.; TIPPETT, D. B. (2004). Project risk management using the Project Risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal. Vol. 16, No. 4 – December.
FERREIRA, A. G. G. (2003). FMEA em Gerenciamento de Projetos. In: SEMINÁRIO GESTÃO DE PROJETOS – SUCESU, São Paulo.
GAVRIN, D. A. (1992). Gerenciando a Qualidade. A visão estratégica e competitiva. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark Editora.
HARLAND, C. BRENCHLEY, R.; WALKER, H. (2003). Risk in supply network. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. V. 9. Pp. 51-62.
HOYLE, D. (2017). ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook. Increasing the Quality of an Organization’s Outputs. 17th Edition. Routhledge – Taylor & Francis Group. London and New York.
IATF 16946:2016. AUTOMOTIVE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STANDARD. Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations. International Automotive Task Force.
MARSHALL, C. (2002). Medindo e Gerenciando Riscos Operacionais em Instituições Financeiras. Tradução Bazán Tecnologia e Linguística. Revisão Técnica João Carlos Douat. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark Editora.
RITCHIE B.; BRINDLEY, C. (2007). Supply chain risk management and performance: A guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27 Issue: 3, pp.303-322.
SANTOS, P, S, M. (2002). Gestão de riscos empresariais. Osasco, SP: Novo Século Editora.
SHENHAR, A. J.; THISHLER, A.; DVIR, D.; LIPOVETSKY, S.; LECHLER, T. (2002). Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach. R & D Management, 32, 2.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (1997), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Organizational and Market Change. John Wiley Ed., Chichester.
The Journal reserves the right to make normative, spelling and grammatical changes in the published article, aiming at maintaining the proper standard of the language, while respecting the personal style of the authors.
Author (s) are fully responsible for the published article. Journal of Lean Systems is not responsible for any violations of Copyright.
Journal of Lean Systems allows the author to retain the copyright of articles accepted for publication without restriction.
Plagiarism constitutes unethical behavior and is inconceivable. This journal reserves the right to use any methods of detecting plagiarism to analyze the submitted works.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons License.