Normativiness of coercion in the Kantian legal system in three steps
Palabras clave:
deduction, unconditionality, normativity, coercion, procedureResumen
The purpose of this paper is to argue about how legal deduction based on freedom can promote the normativity of right. Without being able to offer a definitive answer, the debate on the distinction between ethics and right is used as a strategy to address the arguments in favor of a strong and unconditional normativity of right. In this context, it is argued that Kantian right is derived from practical freedom and is a subspecies of morality, from which derives its unconditional normative force. This connection can be made from the objective practical reality of right, through which is perceptible a singular and unconditional legal-normative externality, which should not be reduced to the factual reality of positive right. The consequence of these arguments is that, for legal coercion to be normatively consistent, it must be based on legal reasons, that is, argumentative evidence that can be fundamentally traced back to practical freedom. In the end, a validation procedure of coercion is presented in three steps, clarifying how it would be possible to identify the unconditionality of the right normativity in the legal Kantian system.
Citas
ALMEIDA, Guido Antonio de. Sobre o princípio e a lei universal do direito em Kant. Kriterion, [S.l.], Belo Horizonte, nº 114, p. 209-222, Dez. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-512X2006000200002. Available at: <https://www.scielo.br/j/kr/a/S77PPJMK4xcfZJzNh35s8nJ/?lang=p>t. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
BAIASU, Sorin. Kant’s Justification of Welfare. Diametros, [S.l], v. 1, no. 39, p. 1-28, Mar. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.39.2014.563. Available at: <https://diametros.uj.edu.pl/diametros/article/view/563>. Access on: 28 Aug. 2023.
_______. Right’s Complex Relation to Ethics in Kant: The Limits of Independentism. Kant-Studien, [S.l.], v. 107, no. 1, pp. 2-33, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0002. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0002/html>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
BECKENKAMP, Joãosinho. O Direito como Exterioridade da Legislação Prática da Razão em Kant. Ethic@, v.2, no. 2 pp. 151-171, Florianópolis, 2003. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/14615>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
_______. O significado prático de termos modais na filosofia moral kantiana. Studia Kantiana, [S.l.], v.16, no. 2, pp. 57-67, Ago. 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v16i2.89792. Available at: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/studiakantiana/article/view/89792/48513>. Access on: 02 Set. 2023.
_______. Sobre a moralidade do direito em Kant. Ethic@, [S.l.], v.8, no. 1, pp. 63-83, Florianópolis, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2009v8n1p63. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2009v8n1p63>. Access on: 02 Set. 2023.
BERND, Ludwig. Kants Rechtslehre: Kant-Forschungen II. Hamburg: Meiner, 1988.
_______. Whence Public Right? The Role of Theoretical and Practical Reasoning in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
BOBBIO, Norberto. Direito e estado no pensamento de Emanuel Kant. Translation by Alfredo Fait. 2nd edition. Brasília: Publisher University of Brasília, 1992.
BYRD, B. Sharon.; HRUSCHKA, Joachim. Kant's Doctrine of Right. A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
CALOVI, Gustavo Ellwanger. O conflito entre liberdades e a fundação de um corpo jurídico comum no pensamento político de Kant. Controvérsia, [S.l.], v. 9, no. 3, pp. 116-124, Set-Dez. São Leopoldo, 2013.
CORTINA, Adela. Aporofobia, a aversão ao pobre: um desafio para a democracia. Translation by Daniel Fabre. São Paulo, SP: Contracorrente, 2020.
DAVIES, Luke J. Kant on Welfare: Five Unsuccessful Defences. Kantian Review, [S.l], v. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-25, Kantian Review, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S136941541900044X. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/abs/kant-on-welfare-five-unsuccessful-defences/99EB7AF406F9287AA6A1F875B8B8FB20>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
DURÃO, Aylton Barbieri. O problema dos direitos humanos em Kant. Griot: Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 20, no. 1, pp. 303-313, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1375. Available at: <https://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1375>. Access on: 3 Set. 2023.
EBBINGHAUS, Julius. Gesammelte Aufsätze, Vorträge und Reden. Darmstadt: 1968.
FAGGION, Andrea. Arguments against Redistributive Justice based on Kant’s Doctrine of Private Right. Kantovskij Sbornik, [S.l], no. 34, pp. 49-56, 2015. DOI: 10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-ENG-4. Available at: <https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/8f7/Faggion_49-56.pdf>. Access on: 28 Aug. 2023.
_______. Kantian Right and Poverty Relief. Ethic@, [S.l], v.13, no. 2, pp. 283-302, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2014v13n2p283. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2014v13n2p283>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
FLIKSCHUH, Katrin. Kant’s Indemonstrable Postulate of Right: Response to Paul Guyer. Kantian Review, [S.l], v. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-39, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400000790. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/abs/kants-indemonstrable-postulate-of-right-a-response-to-paul-guyer/DF4135B305F8F32F4FFBA5F68DE530BD>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
GEISMANN, Georg. Kant und kein Ende. Band 2. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie. Würzburg, 2010.
GILABERT, Pablo. Kant and the Claims of the Poor. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, [S.l], v. 43, no. 2, pp. 382-418, Sep. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374.x. Available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
GREGOR, Mary J. Laws of Freedom: a study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. New York, NY: Barnes & Nobles Inc., 1963.
GUYER, Paul. Autonomia e responsabilidade na filosofia política de Kant. In: BORGES, Maria de Lourdes; HECK, José. Kant: liberdade e natureza. Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC, 2005.
_______. Kant and the experience of freedom. Essays on aesthetics and morality. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1996.
_______. Kant on Freedom, Right, and Happiness. Cambrigde, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
_______. Kant's Deductions of the Principles of Right. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
HASAN, Rafeeq. Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state. European Journal Philosophy, [S.l], v. 26, no. 3, pp. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12331. Available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12331#pane-pcw-related>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
HÖFFE, Otfried. Categorical Principles of Right: A Counterpoint of Modernity. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press, 1996.
_______. O Imperativo Categórico do direito: uma interpretação da “Introdução à Doutrina do Direito”. Studia Kantiana, [S.l], v.1, n. 01, pp. 203-236, 1998. Available at: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/studiakantiana/article/download/91458/49579>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
HOLTMAN, Sarah Williams. Kantian Justice and Poverty Relief. Kant-Studien, [S.l], v. 95, n. 1, pp. 86-106, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2004.008. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant.2004.008/html>. Access on: 29 Aut. 2023.
_______. Justice, Welfare and the Kantian State. From the book Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, edited by Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann and Ralph Schumacher, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, [S.l], 2014, pp. 152-160. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874129.2134. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110874129.2134/html>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
HORN, Christoph. Kant’s Political Philosophy as a Theory of Non-Ideal Normativity. De Gruyter, Kant-Studien, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 107, pp. 89–110, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0005. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0005/html. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
KAIN, Patrick. Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason. In: LIPSCOMB, Benjamin; KRUEGER, James. Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. De Gruyter, Kant-Studien, [S.l.], chapter 8, pp. 211-230. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220049.4.211. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110220049.4.211/html>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
KANT, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. The Cambridge Edition of The Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
_______. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. The Cambridge Edition of The Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
_______. Practical Philosophy. Translated and Edited by Mary J. Gregor. General Introduction by Allen Wood. The Cambridge Edition of The Works Of Immanuel Kant in Translation series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
_______. Lógica. Translated from original establish by Gottlob Benjamin Jäsche by Guido Antônio de Almeida. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Tempo Brasileiro, 1992.
_______. Lectures on logic. Translated and edited by J. Michael Young. The Cambridge Edition of The Works Of Immanuel Kant in Translation series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
KAUFMANN, Mathias. The Relation between Right and Coercion: Analytic or Synthetic?. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Right and Ethics, [S.l.], vol. 5, pp. 73-84, 1997. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43593588. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
KERSTING, Wolfgang. Kant's Concept of the State. In: WILLIAMS, Howard. Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
_______. Wohlgeordnete Freiheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.
KLEIN, Joel. A relação entre ética e direito na filosofia política de Kant. Manuscrito – Rev. Int. Fil., [S.l.], Campinas, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 165-221, Jan-Jun. 2014. Available at: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8641968. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
LEBAR, Mark. Kant on Welfare. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, [S.l.], v. 29, no. 2, pp. 225-249, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1999.10717512. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-philosophy/article/abs/kant-on-welfare/1789E979A54F23B6D429B38BC34AE9B3>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
LINDEN, Harry van den. Kantian Ethics and Socialism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1988.
LOPES, Egyle Hannah do Nascimento. A relação entre direito e moral no âmbito da fundamentação do direito kantiano. Dissertation (master’s degree in philosophy). Department of Human Science of Universidade Federal do Paraná. Advisor Prof. Dr. Joel Thiago Klein. Co-supervisor Prof. Dr. Cristina Foroni Consani. Curitiba, 2021.
MADRID, Nuria Sánchez. Kant on Poverty and Welfare: Social Demands and Juridical Goals in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. A shortened version was published in the collective volume Kant’s Doctrine of Right in Twenty-first Century, by University of Wales Press, 2016.
_______. Poverty and Civil Recognition in Kant’s Juridical Philosophy. Critical Remarks. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, [S.l.], v. 75, no. 1, pp. 33-50, 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0033. Available at: https://www.publicacoesfacfil.pt/product.php?id_product=1205. Access on: 25 Aug. 2023.
_______. Private property and a priori general united will in Kant’s Rechtslehre. Some troubles with Kant’s alleged foundation of liberalism. Studia Kantiana, [S.l.], v. 11, no. 15. pp. 103-120, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v11i15.88871. Available at: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/studiakantiana/article/view/88871/47823>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
_______. Has Social Justice any Legitimacy in Kant's Theory of Right? The Empirical Conditions of the Legal State as a Civil Union. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia, [S.l.], v. 37, no. 2, p. 127-146, May/Aug., Marília, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732014000200007. Available at: <https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3921>. Access on: 25 Aug. 2023.
MARTINS, Clélia Aparecida. A Rechtslehre e a Filosofia da história, de Kant. Rev. Filos., Aurora, [S.l.], Curitiba, v. 24, n. 34, pp. 241-264, Jan.-Jun, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/rfa.v24i34.7499. Available at: <https://periodicos.pucpr.br/aurora/article/view/7499>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
MENDUS, Susan. Kant: ‘An Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois?’. In: WILLIAMS, Howard Lloyd. (ed.). Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press, 1992.
MERLE, Jean-Christophe. Uma crítica kantiana da teoria da punição de Kant. Revista Faculdade de Direito, [S.l.], Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, artigos, n. 40 (2001), 2014. Available at: <https://revista.direito.ufmg.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1216>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
MULHOLLAND, Leslie Arthur. Kant’s system of rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
NANCE, Michael. Kantian Right and the Categorical Imperative: Response to Willaschek. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, [S.l], v. 20, issue 4, pp. 541-556, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2012.668921. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672559.2012.668921>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
PINZANI, Alessandro. Beati Possidentes? Kant on Inequality and Poverty. Ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 16, no. 3, pp. 475-492, Dec., Florianópolis, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2017v16n3p475. Available at:< https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2017v16n3p475>. Access on: 29 aug. 2023.
_______. El misterio de la pobreza: ¿Cómo puede una Doctrina Metafísica del Derecho ayudarnos a entender la realidad social? Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy, Madrid, n. 15, pp. 199-220, jun., 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.con-textoskantianos.net/index.php/revista/article/view/648/1084>. Acesso n: 26 aug. 2024.
_______. O papel sistemático das regras pseudo-ulpianas na Doutrina do Direito de Kant. Studia Kantiana, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 8, pp. 94-120, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v7i8.88580. Available at: <https://cursoapinzani.paginas.ufsc.br/files/2014/12/O-papel-sistematico-das-regras-pseudo-ulpianas.pdf>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
POGGE, Thomas. Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
_______. Kant's Theory of Justice. De Gruyter, Kant-Studien, [S.l], n. 79, pp. 407–33, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1988.79.1-4.407. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant.1988.79.1-4.407/html>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
RIPSTEIN, Arthur. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, [S.l.], n. 1, vol. 22, pp. 2-35, Blackwell Publishing, Inc, 2004. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557980>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009b.
_______. Hindering a Hindrance to Freedom. Jahrbuch Für Recht Und Ethik / Annual Review of Right and Ethics, [S.l], vol. 16, pp. 227-250, 2008, Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43579358>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. Kant on Right and Justice. in HILL, Thomas. A Companion to Kant’s Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009a.
ROSEN, Allen. Kant’s theory of justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
SOLARI, Gioele. Studi storici di filosofía del diritto. Turim: G. Giappichelli, 1949.
TERRA, Ricardo. A Política Tensa: ideia e realidade na Filosofia da História de Kant. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1995.
TONETTO, Milene Consenso. Direitos humanos em Kant e Habermas. Florianópolis: Insular, 2010.
TORRES, João Carlos Brum. Boutwerk, Balthazar Barbosa, Willaschek e os Paradoxos da Filosofia do Direito de Kant. ANALYTICA, [S.l], Rio de Janeiro, n. 2, vol. 22, pp. 1-27, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35920/arf.2018.v22i2.1-27. Available at: <https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/view/37151>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
TREVISAN, Diego Kosbiau. Dimensões da liberdade na filosofia político-jurídica de Kant. Princípios Revista de Filosofia, [S.l], v. 21, n. 36, Jul.-Dez., p. 199-236, Natal, 2014. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/6310>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
VARDEN, Helga. Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy - How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the “Doctrine of Right. Kant-Studien. 101 Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, [S.l], v. 101, pp. 331 – 251, ISSN 0022.8877, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/KANT.2010.021. Available at: <https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/kants-non-absolutist-conception-of-political-legitimacy-how-publi>. Access on: 29 Mar. 2024.
WEINRIB, Ernest Jacob. Poverty and Property in Kant's System of Rights. Notre Dame Law Review, [S.l.], v. 78, no. 3, pp. 795-828, 2003. Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol78/iss3/5. Access on: 25 Aug. 2023.
WILLASCHEK, Marcus. Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right be Derived from his Moral Theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 17, pp. 49–70, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550802610982. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672550802610982>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right from the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 20, pp. 557-564, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2012.669114. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672559.2012.669114>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. WATKINS, Eric. Kant on cognition and knowledge. Synthese, [S.l.], v. 179, pp. 3195–3213, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4. Available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridical Rights in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
_______. Why the “Doctrine of Right” does not belong in the “Metaphysics of Morals: On some Basic Distinctions in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, [S.l.], vol. 5, pp. 205-227, 1997. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43593594>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
WILLIAMS, Howard. Kant and libertarianism. In: BAIASU, Sorin; TIMMONS, Mark. (eds.). Kant on Practical Justification: interpretative essays. New York, NW: Oxford University Press, 2013.
_______. Kant’s Optimism in his Social and Political Theory. In: WILLIAMS, Howard Lloyd. (ed.). Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press, 1992.
_______. Kant’s Political Philosophy. England, UK: Basil Blackwell Publisher Limited, 1983.
WOOD, Allen. The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: University Press, 2002.
ZÖLLER, Günter. Autocracia. A psicopolítica do governo-de-si em Platão e Kant. Discurso, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 42, pp. 183-220, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2012.69233. Available at: <https://www.revistas.usp.br/discurso/article/view/69233>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Indalécio Robson Rocha
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
