Normativiness of coercion in the Kantian legal system in three steps
Palavras-chave:
dedução, incondicionalidade, normatividade, coerção, procedimentoResumo
O objetivo deste artigo consiste em argumentar sobre como a dedução jurídica baseada na liberdade pode promover a normatividade do direito. Sem poder oferecer uma resposta definitiva, aproveita-se o debate sobre a distinção entre ética e direito como estratégia para endereçar os argumentos em favor de uma forte e incondicional força normativa do direito. Neste contexto, sustenta-se que o direito kantiano é derivado da liberdade prática e é uma subespécie da moral, da qual provém sua força normativa incondicional. Essa conexão pode ser realizada a partir da realidade prática objetiva do direito, pela qual é perceptível uma externalidade jurídico-normativa singular, incondicional, que não deve ser reduzida à realidade fática do direito positivo. A consequência desses argumentos é que, para que a coerção jurídica seja normativamente consistente, deve ser baseada em razões jurídicas, isto é, provas argumentativas que possam ser reconduzidas fundamentalmente à liberdade prática. Ao final, é apresentado um procedimento de validação da coerção em três etapas, esclarecendo como seria possível identificar a incondicionalidade da normatividade do direito no sistema jurídico kantiano.
Referências
ALMEIDA, Guido Antonio de. Sobre o princípio e a lei universal do direito em Kant. Kriterion, [S.l.], Belo Horizonte, nº 114, p. 209-222, Dez. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-512X2006000200002. Available at: <https://www.scielo.br/j/kr/a/S77PPJMK4xcfZJzNh35s8nJ/?lang=p>t. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
BAIASU, Sorin. Kant’s Justification of Welfare. Diametros, [S.l], v. 1, no. 39, p. 1-28, Mar. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.39.2014.563. Available at: <https://diametros.uj.edu.pl/diametros/article/view/563>. Access on: 28 Aug. 2023.
_______. Right’s Complex Relation to Ethics in Kant: The Limits of Independentism. Kant-Studien, [S.l.], v. 107, no. 1, pp. 2-33, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0002. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0002/html>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
BECKENKAMP, Joãosinho. O Direito como Exterioridade da Legislação Prática da Razão em Kant. Ethic@, v.2, no. 2 pp. 151-171, Florianópolis, 2003. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/14615>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
_______. O significado prático de termos modais na filosofia moral kantiana. Studia Kantiana, [S.l.], v.16, no. 2, pp. 57-67, Ago. 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v16i2.89792. Available at: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/studiakantiana/article/view/89792/48513>. Access on: 02 Set. 2023.
_______. Sobre a moralidade do direito em Kant. Ethic@, [S.l.], v.8, no. 1, pp. 63-83, Florianópolis, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2009v8n1p63. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2009v8n1p63>. Access on: 02 Set. 2023.
BERND, Ludwig. Kants Rechtslehre: Kant-Forschungen II. Hamburg: Meiner, 1988.
_______. Whence Public Right? The Role of Theoretical and Practical Reasoning in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
BOBBIO, Norberto. Direito e estado no pensamento de Emanuel Kant. Translation by Alfredo Fait. 2nd edition. Brasília: Publisher University of Brasília, 1992.
BYRD, B. Sharon.; HRUSCHKA, Joachim. Kant's Doctrine of Right. A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
CALOVI, Gustavo Ellwanger. O conflito entre liberdades e a fundação de um corpo jurídico comum no pensamento político de Kant. Controvérsia, [S.l.], v. 9, no. 3, pp. 116-124, Set-Dez. São Leopoldo, 2013.
CORTINA, Adela. Aporofobia, a aversão ao pobre: um desafio para a democracia. Translation by Daniel Fabre. São Paulo, SP: Contracorrente, 2020.
DAVIES, Luke J. Kant on Welfare: Five Unsuccessful Defences. Kantian Review, [S.l], v. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-25, Kantian Review, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S136941541900044X. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/abs/kant-on-welfare-five-unsuccessful-defences/99EB7AF406F9287AA6A1F875B8B8FB20>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
DURÃO, Aylton Barbieri. O problema dos direitos humanos em Kant. Griot: Revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 20, no. 1, pp. 303-313, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1375. Available at: <https://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1375>. Access on: 3 Set. 2023.
EBBINGHAUS, Julius. Gesammelte Aufsätze, Vorträge und Reden. Darmstadt: 1968.
FAGGION, Andrea. Arguments against Redistributive Justice based on Kant’s Doctrine of Private Right. Kantovskij Sbornik, [S.l], no. 34, pp. 49-56, 2015. DOI: 10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-ENG-4. Available at: <https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/8f7/Faggion_49-56.pdf>. Access on: 28 Aug. 2023.
_______. Kantian Right and Poverty Relief. Ethic@, [S.l], v.13, no. 2, pp. 283-302, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2014v13n2p283. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2014v13n2p283>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
FLIKSCHUH, Katrin. Kant’s Indemonstrable Postulate of Right: Response to Paul Guyer. Kantian Review, [S.l], v. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-39, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415400000790. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/abs/kants-indemonstrable-postulate-of-right-a-response-to-paul-guyer/DF4135B305F8F32F4FFBA5F68DE530BD>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
GEISMANN, Georg. Kant und kein Ende. Band 2. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie. Würzburg, 2010.
GILABERT, Pablo. Kant and the Claims of the Poor. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, [S.l], v. 43, no. 2, pp. 382-418, Sep. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374.x. Available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
GREGOR, Mary J. Laws of Freedom: a study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. New York, NY: Barnes & Nobles Inc., 1963.
GUYER, Paul. Autonomia e responsabilidade na filosofia política de Kant. In: BORGES, Maria de Lourdes; HECK, José. Kant: liberdade e natureza. Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC, 2005.
_______. Kant and the experience of freedom. Essays on aesthetics and morality. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1996.
_______. Kant on Freedom, Right, and Happiness. Cambrigde, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
_______. Kant's Deductions of the Principles of Right. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
HASAN, Rafeeq. Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state. European Journal Philosophy, [S.l], v. 26, no. 3, pp. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12331. Available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12331#pane-pcw-related>. Access on: 03 Set. 2023.
HÖFFE, Otfried. Categorical Principles of Right: A Counterpoint of Modernity. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press, 1996.
_______. O Imperativo Categórico do direito: uma interpretação da “Introdução à Doutrina do Direito”. Studia Kantiana, [S.l], v.1, n. 01, pp. 203-236, 1998. Available at: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/studiakantiana/article/download/91458/49579>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
HOLTMAN, Sarah Williams. Kantian Justice and Poverty Relief. Kant-Studien, [S.l], v. 95, n. 1, pp. 86-106, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2004.008. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant.2004.008/html>. Access on: 29 Aut. 2023.
_______. Justice, Welfare and the Kantian State. From the book Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, edited by Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann and Ralph Schumacher, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, [S.l], 2014, pp. 152-160. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874129.2134. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110874129.2134/html>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
HORN, Christoph. Kant’s Political Philosophy as a Theory of Non-Ideal Normativity. De Gruyter, Kant-Studien, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 107, pp. 89–110, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0005. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2016-0005/html. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
KAIN, Patrick. Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason. In: LIPSCOMB, Benjamin; KRUEGER, James. Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. De Gruyter, Kant-Studien, [S.l.], chapter 8, pp. 211-230. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220049.4.211. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110220049.4.211/html>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
KANT, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. The Cambridge Edition of The Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
_______. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. The Cambridge Edition of The Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
_______. Practical Philosophy. Translated and Edited by Mary J. Gregor. General Introduction by Allen Wood. The Cambridge Edition of The Works Of Immanuel Kant in Translation series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
_______. Lógica. Translated from original establish by Gottlob Benjamin Jäsche by Guido Antônio de Almeida. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Tempo Brasileiro, 1992.
_______. Lectures on logic. Translated and edited by J. Michael Young. The Cambridge Edition of The Works Of Immanuel Kant in Translation series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
KAUFMANN, Mathias. The Relation between Right and Coercion: Analytic or Synthetic?. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Right and Ethics, [S.l.], vol. 5, pp. 73-84, 1997. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43593588. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
KERSTING, Wolfgang. Kant's Concept of the State. In: WILLIAMS, Howard. Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
_______. Wohlgeordnete Freiheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.
KLEIN, Joel. A relação entre ética e direito na filosofia política de Kant. Manuscrito – Rev. Int. Fil., [S.l.], Campinas, v. 37, n. 1, pp. 165-221, Jan-Jun. 2014. Available at: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8641968. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
LEBAR, Mark. Kant on Welfare. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, [S.l.], v. 29, no. 2, pp. 225-249, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1999.10717512. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-philosophy/article/abs/kant-on-welfare/1789E979A54F23B6D429B38BC34AE9B3>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
LINDEN, Harry van den. Kantian Ethics and Socialism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1988.
LOPES, Egyle Hannah do Nascimento. A relação entre direito e moral no âmbito da fundamentação do direito kantiano. Dissertation (master’s degree in philosophy). Department of Human Science of Universidade Federal do Paraná. Advisor Prof. Dr. Joel Thiago Klein. Co-supervisor Prof. Dr. Cristina Foroni Consani. Curitiba, 2021.
MADRID, Nuria Sánchez. Kant on Poverty and Welfare: Social Demands and Juridical Goals in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. A shortened version was published in the collective volume Kant’s Doctrine of Right in Twenty-first Century, by University of Wales Press, 2016.
_______. Poverty and Civil Recognition in Kant’s Juridical Philosophy. Critical Remarks. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, [S.l.], v. 75, no. 1, pp. 33-50, 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0033. Available at: https://www.publicacoesfacfil.pt/product.php?id_product=1205. Access on: 25 Aug. 2023.
_______. Private property and a priori general united will in Kant’s Rechtslehre. Some troubles with Kant’s alleged foundation of liberalism. Studia Kantiana, [S.l.], v. 11, no. 15. pp. 103-120, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v11i15.88871. Available at: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/studiakantiana/article/view/88871/47823>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
_______. Has Social Justice any Legitimacy in Kant's Theory of Right? The Empirical Conditions of the Legal State as a Civil Union. TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia, [S.l.], v. 37, no. 2, p. 127-146, May/Aug., Marília, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732014000200007. Available at: <https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3921>. Access on: 25 Aug. 2023.
MARTINS, Clélia Aparecida. A Rechtslehre e a Filosofia da história, de Kant. Rev. Filos., Aurora, [S.l.], Curitiba, v. 24, n. 34, pp. 241-264, Jan.-Jun, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/rfa.v24i34.7499. Available at: <https://periodicos.pucpr.br/aurora/article/view/7499>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
MENDUS, Susan. Kant: ‘An Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois?’. In: WILLIAMS, Howard Lloyd. (ed.). Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press, 1992.
MERLE, Jean-Christophe. Uma crítica kantiana da teoria da punição de Kant. Revista Faculdade de Direito, [S.l.], Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, artigos, n. 40 (2001), 2014. Available at: <https://revista.direito.ufmg.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1216>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
MULHOLLAND, Leslie Arthur. Kant’s system of rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
NANCE, Michael. Kantian Right and the Categorical Imperative: Response to Willaschek. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, [S.l], v. 20, issue 4, pp. 541-556, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2012.668921. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672559.2012.668921>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
PINZANI, Alessandro. Beati Possidentes? Kant on Inequality and Poverty. Ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 16, no. 3, pp. 475-492, Dec., Florianópolis, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2017v16n3p475. Available at:< https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2017v16n3p475>. Access on: 29 aug. 2023.
_______. El misterio de la pobreza: ¿Cómo puede una Doctrina Metafísica del Derecho ayudarnos a entender la realidad social? Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy, Madrid, n. 15, pp. 199-220, jun., 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.con-textoskantianos.net/index.php/revista/article/view/648/1084>. Acesso n: 26 aug. 2024.
_______. O papel sistemático das regras pseudo-ulpianas na Doutrina do Direito de Kant. Studia Kantiana, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 8, pp. 94-120, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/sk.v7i8.88580. Available at: <https://cursoapinzani.paginas.ufsc.br/files/2014/12/O-papel-sistematico-das-regras-pseudo-ulpianas.pdf>. Access on: 29 Aug. 2023.
POGGE, Thomas. Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
_______. Kant's Theory of Justice. De Gruyter, Kant-Studien, [S.l], n. 79, pp. 407–33, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1988.79.1-4.407. Available at: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant.1988.79.1-4.407/html>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
RIPSTEIN, Arthur. Authority and Coercion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, [S.l.], n. 1, vol. 22, pp. 2-35, Blackwell Publishing, Inc, 2004. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557980>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009b.
_______. Hindering a Hindrance to Freedom. Jahrbuch Für Recht Und Ethik / Annual Review of Right and Ethics, [S.l], vol. 16, pp. 227-250, 2008, Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43579358>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. Kant on Right and Justice. in HILL, Thomas. A Companion to Kant’s Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009a.
ROSEN, Allen. Kant’s theory of justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
SOLARI, Gioele. Studi storici di filosofía del diritto. Turim: G. Giappichelli, 1949.
TERRA, Ricardo. A Política Tensa: ideia e realidade na Filosofia da História de Kant. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1995.
TONETTO, Milene Consenso. Direitos humanos em Kant e Habermas. Florianópolis: Insular, 2010.
TORRES, João Carlos Brum. Boutwerk, Balthazar Barbosa, Willaschek e os Paradoxos da Filosofia do Direito de Kant. ANALYTICA, [S.l], Rio de Janeiro, n. 2, vol. 22, pp. 1-27, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35920/arf.2018.v22i2.1-27. Available at: <https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/view/37151>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
TREVISAN, Diego Kosbiau. Dimensões da liberdade na filosofia político-jurídica de Kant. Princípios Revista de Filosofia, [S.l], v. 21, n. 36, Jul.-Dez., p. 199-236, Natal, 2014. Available at: <https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/6310>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
VARDEN, Helga. Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy - How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the “Doctrine of Right. Kant-Studien. 101 Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, [S.l], v. 101, pp. 331 – 251, ISSN 0022.8877, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/KANT.2010.021. Available at: <https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/kants-non-absolutist-conception-of-political-legitimacy-how-publi>. Access on: 29 Mar. 2024.
WEINRIB, Ernest Jacob. Poverty and Property in Kant's System of Rights. Notre Dame Law Review, [S.l.], v. 78, no. 3, pp. 795-828, 2003. Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol78/iss3/5. Access on: 25 Aug. 2023.
WILLASCHEK, Marcus. Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right be Derived from his Moral Theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 17, pp. 49–70, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550802610982. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672550802610982>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right from the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 20, pp. 557-564, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2012.669114. Available at: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672559.2012.669114>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. WATKINS, Eric. Kant on cognition and knowledge. Synthese, [S.l.], v. 179, pp. 3195–3213, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4. Available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
_______. Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridical Rights in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
_______. Why the “Doctrine of Right” does not belong in the “Metaphysics of Morals: On some Basic Distinctions in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, [S.l.], vol. 5, pp. 205-227, 1997. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/43593594>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
WILLIAMS, Howard. Kant and libertarianism. In: BAIASU, Sorin; TIMMONS, Mark. (eds.). Kant on Practical Justification: interpretative essays. New York, NW: Oxford University Press, 2013.
_______. Kant’s Optimism in his Social and Political Theory. In: WILLIAMS, Howard Lloyd. (ed.). Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press, 1992.
_______. Kant’s Political Philosophy. England, UK: Basil Blackwell Publisher Limited, 1983.
WOOD, Allen. The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy. In: TIMMONS, Mark. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: University Press, 2002.
ZÖLLER, Günter. Autocracia. A psicopolítica do governo-de-si em Platão e Kant. Discurso, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 42, pp. 183-220, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2012.69233. Available at: <https://www.revistas.usp.br/discurso/article/view/69233>. Access on: 29 dec. 2023.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Indalécio Robson Rocha
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
