Implementation overview of organizational routines in Lean Product Development (LPD)

Laryssa Menegazzo Sores Antunes, Fernando Antônio Forcellini, Jaime Andrés Lozano Cadena, Pâmela Teixeira Fernandes


Most organizations cannot sustain one of the principles of the Lean approach, such as the pursuit of perfection / continuous improvement. So they fail over time. The proposal for the use of the same as the facts and functional functions to the practical practice, the functional function and the approach to work with other aspect as tangible (thought gerential, routines). Some authors advocate an idea that journeys are a way of maintaining a journey for continuous improvement. Based on this, this article aimed to analyze how the organizational routines are worked with the objective of maintaining the search for continuous improvement in Lean Product Development. The method awoke the research for the theoretical-conceptual process, based on the systematic bibliographical review for the accomplishment of bibliometric analysis and scientific content. The research resulted in a portfolio of 12 articles, which were analyzed according to the purpose of a research. This surveys aims to contribute to the verification of a gap in the knowledge of how routines are performed and treated within the Lean Product Development in order to assist as organizations in the quest for the sustainability of continuous improvement.


Organizational Routines; Lean Product Development; Systematic Bibliographic Review.


Adamides, E. D., & Karfaki, E. (2017). How initiatives renew operations strategy and its linkage to competitive strategy: a micro-level perspective. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 26(2), 141-16.

Al-jawazneh, B. E., & SMADI, Z. M. D. A. (2011). The behavioral pattern of continuous improvement at the manufacturing companies in al-hassan industrial estate (Jordan). European Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2).

Alves, André Cherubini; Zen, Aurora Carneiro; Padula, Antônio Domingus. (2011). Routines, capabilities and innovation in the Brazilian wine industry. Journal of technology management & innovation, 6(2), 128-144.

Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing. Science, 247(4945). 10.1126/science.247.4945.920

Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and corporate change, 13(4), 643-678.

Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and corporate change, 14(5), 775-791.

Bessant, J., & Caffyn, S. (1997). High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1), 7-28.

Bygdas, A. L. (2006, July). Enacting dynamic capabilities in distributed organisational environments. In Proceedings of the EGOS Conference, Bergen, Norway (Vol. 22, No. 1).

Briggs, C., & Kleiner, B. H. (2002). Managing human behaviour in the federal government: The promise of integrated product teams in managing major system acquisitions. Management Research News, 25(3), 21-27. https://

Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M. R., & Sindakis, S. (2017). An exploration of contemporary organizational artifacts and routines in a sustainable excellence context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 35-56.

Cohen, M. D. (1991). Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organization science, 2(1), 135-139.

Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization science, 5(4), 554-568.

Cohen, M. D., Levinthal, D. A., & Warglien, M. (2014). Collective performance: modeling the interaction of habit-based actions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(2), 329-360.

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), 169-187.

Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative science quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.

Ferenhof, H. A., & Fernandes, R. F. (2016). Desmistificando a revisão de literatura como base para redação científica: método SFF. Revista ACB, 21(3), 550-563.

Forno, A. J. D., Forcellini, F. A., & Bornia, A. C. DESENVOLVIMENTO LEAN DE PRODUTOS: UMA ANÁLISE DA LITERATURA. In Workshop em Sistemas e Processos Industriais.

Gersick, C. J., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 47(1), 65-97.

Liker, J. K., & Morgan, J. M. (2006). The Toyota way in services: the case of lean product development. Academy of management perspectives, 20(2), 5-20.

Leana, C. R., & Barry, B. (2000). Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 753-759.

León, H. C. M., & Farris, J. A. (2011). Lean product development research: Current state and future directions. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 29-51.

Marcus, A., & Naveh, E. (2005). How a new rule is adjusted to context: Knowledge creation following the implementation of the ISO 9000 quality standard. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 13(2), 106-126.

Markowski, P., & Dabhilkar, M. (2016). Collaboration for continuous innovation: routines for knowledge integration in healthcare. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(3-4), 212-231.

Mcmanus, H. L. (2005). Product development value stream analysis and mapping manual (PDVSM). Cambridge: The Lean Aerospace Initiative, Center for Technology, Policy, and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 116 p.

Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Disponível em: Acesso em: 08 de fevereiro, 2019.

NOGUEIRA, M. D. G. S. Proposta de método para avaliação de desempenho de práticas da produção enxuta–ADPPE. 2007. 113f (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Produção). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, UFRGS, Porto Alegre). Disponível em: Acesso em: 15 de fevereiro, 2019.

Pentland, B. T., & Rueter, H. H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative science quarterly, 484-510.

Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective. Journal of operations management, 26(6), 730-748.

Pinheiro, L. M. P., TOLEDO, D., & Carlos, J. (2016). Aplicação da abordagem lean no processo de desenvolvimento de produto: um survey em empresas industriais brasileiras. Gest. Prod., São Carlos, 23(2), 320-332.

Rauniar, R., & Rawski, G. (2012). Organizational structuring and project team structuring in integrated product development project. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 939-952.

Rother, M. (2010). Toyota kata: gerenciando pessoas para melhoria, adaptabilidade e resultados excepcionais. Bookman Editora.

Sartal, A., & Vázquez, X. H. (2017). Implementing Information Technologies and Operational Excellence: planning, emergence and randomness in the survival of adaptive manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 45, 1-16.

Singer, D. J., Doerry, N., & Buckley, M. E. (2009). What Is Set‐Based Design?. Naval Engineers Journal, 121(4), 31-43.

Suarez-Barraza, M. F. (2011). Standardisation without standardisation? A case study of Toyota Motor Corporation. International Journal of Product Development, 15(4), 157-176.

Stańczyk-Hugiet, E., Piórkowska, K., & Stańczyk, S. (2017). Organizational Routines and Context Alteration: A Reconciliation. Argumenta Oeconomica, (2 (39)), 341-371.

Womack, J. P.; Jones, D. T.; Ross, D. (1992). A máquina que mudou o mundo. Campus. 347 p.

Womack, J. P., Jones, DT. (2003). Lean Thinking – Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster. Sydney.

Womack, J. (2006). A lesson to be learned. Manufacturing Engineer, v. 85, n. 2, p. 4-5.

Wu, C. W., & Chen, C. L. (2006). An integrated structural model toward successful continuous improvement activity. Technovation, 26(5-6), 697-707.


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Licença Creative Commons
This journal is licenced under a Creative Commons LicenseCreative Commons - Atribuição-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.

Tel: +554837217062

EPS - Departamento de Engenharia de Produção e Sistemas

CTC - Centro Tecnológico

UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Caixa Postal 476 - Campus Universitário - Trindade