Applying Lean-TRIZ hybrid approach into Toyota kata for organizational level improvement


  • Thiago Bastos Fernandes Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Rodrigo Bastos Fernandes Centro de Inovação SESI em Tecnologias para Saúde
  • Fernando Antônio Forcellini Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina


Lean manufacturing, Continuum improvement, TRIZ, Improvement Kata


The pursuit for competitive advantages demand manufacturers to increase flexibility, productivity and profitability, while reducing operational cost an idle time. The Japanese manufacturer Toyota was capable to develop a unique method to treat those issues, originating the Toyota Production System. This concept was studied, westernized and widely spread as Lean Manufacturing, predominantly by applying best practices – e.g. Kanban, A3 and Value Stream Mapping – from the Japanese facility. Through a variety of reports about unsustainability the mindset behind the improvement was researched, out coming the Toyota Kata approach. This method identified the patterns of relationship among the command chain and the way of identify and solve problems seeking improvement and knowledge, this may be described and a study-action approach. This project presents a Lean-TRIZ proposal for empower organizational level with a systematic support for Challenge creation, meaning to define long term systems operational characteristics. A method based on the state of the art Lean-TRIZ was developed and verified by simulations, hence proposed challenges were evaluated by experts according to quantity, utility and novelty of ideas. Finally, the data was statistically analyzed proving the integrated model capabilities.


Bashkite, V.; Karaulova, T. (2012) Integration of Green thinking into Lean fundamentals by Theory of Inventive Problems-Solving tools. DAAAM International, Vienna, Austria, EU, p. 345-350.

Clarkson, J.; Eckert, C. (2010). Design process improvement: a review of current practice. Springer Science & Business Media.

Dikmen, I.; Birgonul, M. T.; Kiziltas, S. (2005) Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry. Building and environment, v. 40, n. 2, p. 245-255.

Feldman, K. A. (1971) Using the work of others: Some observations on reviewing and integrating. Sociology of Education, p. 86-102.

Ferenhof, H. A.; Fernandes, R. F. (2015) . Passo-a-passo para construção da Revisão Sistemática e Bibliometria. Acesso em, v. 18.

Koren, Yo. (2010) . Globalization and manufacturing paradigms. The Global Manufacturing Revolution: Product-Process-Business Integration and Reconfigurable Systems, p. 1-40.

Kubiak, T. M.; Benbow, D. W. (2009) The certified six sigma black belt handbook. ASQ Quality Press.

March, S. T.; Smith, G. F. (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, v. 15, n. 4, p. 251-266.

Moen, R. (2009) Foundation and History of the PDSA Cycle. In: Asian network for quality conference. Tokyo. https://www. deming. org/sites/default/files/pdf/2015/PDSA_History_Ron_Moen. Pdf.

Montgomery, D C.; Runger, G C.; Calado, V. (2000) Estatística Aplicada E Probabilidade Para Engenheiros . Grupo Gen-LTC.

Morgan, J. M.; Liker, J. K. (2008) Sistema Toyota de desenvolvimento de produto: integrando pessoas, processo e tecnologia. Bookman Editora.

Nakagawa, T. (1998) TRIZ: Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Understanding and Introducing It. Bulletin of Cultural and Natural Sciences in Osaka Gakuin University, n. 37, p. 1-12.

Natee, S.; Low, S. P.; Teo, E. A. (2016) Decision Making and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). In: Quality Function Deployment for Buildable and Sustainable Construction. Springer Singapore. p. 17-55.

Navas, H. VG; Machado, V. Cruz. (2013) Systematic Innovation in a Lean Management Environment. In: IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). p. 2138.

Pahl, G. et al. (2005) Projeto na engenharia. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher.

Pedersen, C. S.; Satchell, S. E. (2000) Small sample analysis of performance measures in the asymmetric response model. Journal of

Financial and Quantitative Analysis, v. 35, n. 3, p. 425-450.

Rother, M. (2008) Toyota kata. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.

Rozenfeld, H.; Forcellini, F. A.; Amaral, D. C. (2000) Gestão de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma referência para a melhoria do processo. Editora Saraiva.

Savransky, S. D. (2000) Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. CRC Press.

Schreiber, D. (2012) Inovação e desenvolvimento organizacional. Editora Feevale.

Shingo, S. (1996) O sistema Toyota de produção. Bookman Editora.

Slack, N. (2007) Administração da produção/Nigel Slack, Stuart

Chambers, Robert Johnston; tradução Maria T. C. de Oliveira, F. Alher; revisão técnica Henrique L. Corrêa–2ª Ed. 7ª reimpr. São Paulo: Atlas.

Smalheiser, N. (2017) How to Make Your Experiments Robust and Reproducible. 1st Edition. Elsevier.

Smith, E. M. (2003) From russia with TRIZ. Mechanical Engineering, v. 125, n. 3, p. D18.

Snowden, D. J.; Boone, M. E. (2007) A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard business review, v. 85, n. 11, p. 68.

Toivonen, T. (2015) Continuous innovation–combining Toyota Kata and TRIZ for sustained innovation. Procedia Engineering, v. 131, p. 963-974.

Womack, J. P.; JONES, D. T.; ROOS, D. (1990) Machine that changed the world. Simon and Schuster.

Xie, M.; Goh, T. N.; Tan, Kay-Chuan. (2003) Advanced QFD applications. ASQ Quality Press.