A convex relationship between batch size production, WIP and manufacturing management philosophies: A study using the Factory Physics methodology approach
Keywords:Factory Physics, production batch size, continual improvement, WIP, Utilization
The study presents a quantity model that use a Factory Physics methodology approach (HOPP; SPEARMAN, 2001). It aims study the impacts of five continual improvement projects (variability in the process and on arrival, time to failure and repair, and set up time), also it simulates the model to three production batch sizes in the middle level of work in process (WIP) and Utilization. In addition, the application in the use in a production environment with a single machine that processes multiple products. The results of work is possible get insights and subsidies with the model that support a number of modern tools and manufacturing management philosophies, Six Sigma; SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die), Toyota Production System / Lean Manufacturing and Quick Response Manufacturing (QRM). Besides, the model also serves to assist in the choice of different possibilities for continual improvement programs on the factory floor.
BAYSAN, S.; KABADURMUS, O.; DURMUSOGLU, M. B. Economic Analysis of POLCA System Design via Simulation: A Multi-Cell Manufacturing Case Study. In: International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 37., 2007, Alexandria, Egypt. 2007.
BHUIYAN, N.; A. BAGHEL. An Overview Of Continuous Improvement: From The Past To The Present. Management Decision, v. 43, n. 5, p. 761-771, 2005.
CARVALHO, L. A.; MENEGON, N. L. The invisible, dangerous work of maintenance professionals: reflections on activity in the automotive industry. Production. V. 25, n.1, p. 201-222, jan./mar. 2015.
CHINET, F.S; GODINHO, M, F. Sistema POLCA: revisão, classificação e análise da literatura. Department of Production Engineering. Gestão & Produção. Vol. 21. n.3. São Paulo. 2014.
GODINHO, M. F.; UZSOY, R.; Effect of lot size reduction and Continuous Improvement on Work In Process and Utilization: study using a combined System Dynamics and Factory Physics approach. Production. Vol. 19 n.1. São Paulo. 2009.
HARROD, J.; KANET, J. J. Applying work flow control in make-to-order job shops. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 143, n. 2, p. 620-626, 2013.
HOPP, W.; M. L. SPEARMAN. Factory Physics. Boston: Irwin, 2001.
PENTILLÄ, M. J. Reducing variability in a semiconductor manufacturing environment. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Boston, Massachusetts Institute of Tehcnology. Master: 75, 2005.
RIEZEBOS, J. Design of POLCA material control systems. Internacional Journal of Production Research, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1455-1477, 2010.
SHINGO, S. A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. Cambridge: Productivity Press, 1986.
STANDRIDGE, C. R. How factory physics helps simulation. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004.
SURI, R. Quick Response Manufacturing: A Companywide Approach to Reducing Lead Times. Portland: Productivity Press, 1998.
WOMACK, J. P. et al. The machine that changed the world. Nova York: Harper Perennial, 2000.
The Journal reserves the right to make normative, spelling and grammatical changes in the published article, aiming at maintaining the proper standard of the language, while respecting the personal style of the authors.
Author (s) are fully responsible for the published article. Journal of Lean Systems is not responsible for any violations of Copyright.
Journal of Lean Systems allows the author to retain the copyright of articles accepted for publication without restriction.
Plagiarism constitutes unethical behavior and is inconceivable. This journal reserves the right to use any methods of detecting plagiarism to analyze the submitted works.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons License.